{"id":"W2126907012","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907071387","title":"Humanité: John Humphrey's Alternative Account of Human Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Rationality; Politics; German; Natural law; Globalization; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Law and economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00126834,0.0006668669,0.0004844213,0.001496978,0.004338856,0.006210159,0.001503075,0.005649246,0.01088282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001766362,0.0003663235,0.0003792462,0.00256001,0.01355513,0.009294452,0.001999513,0.004267949,0.001529183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01110952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004429812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1150613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.148001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987042,0.0006751395,0.00002683027,0.0001319844,0.0003123086,0.0001496555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993401,0.0003875719,0.00004029178,0.00004642135,0.00009876586,0.00008682218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001161075,0.000008205867,0.00005603207,0.00005160233,0.000004013751,0.00008465699,0.002965746,0.0001289325,0.00002589013,0.8615187,0.1303417,0.004803055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001041847,0.00000514899,0.0003557365,0.0003075503,0.000005290418,0.0001438863,0.00249713,0.0002068287,0.00005947738,0.3844779,0.6119149,0.00001571482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003056272,0.2047813,0.006643114,0.2333281,0.002872855,0.00003416226,0.0003079044,0.0000499012,0.5489264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3527465,0.08862376,0.005671806,0.07531852,0.005167643,0.0001961249,0.0003221975,0.0001868125,0.4717666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1150613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2287831,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03597688264922975,"score_gpt":0.3435531791036867,"score_spread":0.3075762964544569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}