{"id":"W2126924946","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.epi-07-2686","title":"A Prospective Evaluation of Insulin and Insulin-like Growth Factor-I as Risk Factors for Endometrial Cancer","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","topic":"Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":268,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University; Women's Health Research Institute","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Endometrial cancer; Medicine; Hazard ratio; Prospective cohort study; Internal medicine; Insulin; Insulin-like growth factor; Endocrinology; Estrogen; Oncology; Overweight; Proportional hazards model; Risk factor; Cancer; Obesity; Gynecology; Confidence interval; Growth factor","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00192429,0.0003137169,0.0010282,0.000401101,0.0001794585,0.000003305356,0.00009163281,0.000328831,0.0003689684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007623415,0.0002457695,0.0003772168,0.0006547081,0.000328727,0.0001468983,0.00004495353,0.0001967859,0.000003222513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007727752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005773271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005137651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002509414,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967949,0.000891892,0.0008658569,0.0006833425,0.0003650881,0.0003989601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960621,0.001988565,0.0008180061,0.0002271758,0.0006837087,0.0002204241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006090823,0.0002787586,0.9282216,0.000125682,0.001983689,0.000001211544,0.0003404597,0.00001167865,0.000495865,0.00008346101,0.0003406177,0.06202611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02149633,0.001771911,0.9592201,0.0001837727,0.001799783,0.000008968387,0.00009046388,0.0002993763,0.003990893,0.01054666,0.0003628356,0.000228981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.954851,0.03937629,0.0005907459,0.0004180988,0.001128215,0.003169793,0.0003059612,0.00004540473,0.0001144748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762684,0.02059246,0.000959796,0.0001349013,0.0003426485,0.001386329,0.000162908,0.0000305916,0.0001219333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06179713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.118153450852713,"score_gpt":0.4054871804362896,"score_spread":0.2873337295835766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}