{"id":"W2127043129","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720120802.2011","title":"A Rational Thinking of the People’s Mediation System of China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Political science; Social harmony; China; Humanities; Harmony (color); Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003933977,0.00003290951,0.00005287623,0.0001079497,0.0005854244,0.00004451544,0.0002163056,0.00002135538,0.00006005271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006330629,0.00002617414,0.00003452264,0.000890126,0.0001470003,0.0006318135,0.00002447037,0.00003438198,0.00001045946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001521412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002690092,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01958903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0330712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993696,0.00000506367,0.00009748616,0.00005417732,0.000303484,0.0001702407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996772,0.000006162241,0.0001282594,0.00005820069,0.0001083179,0.00002184809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[3.272766e-7,0.000005516497,0.0627647,0.00002000025,0.000001468536,1.820714e-8,0.0004742286,0.000002606672,0.0002130914,0.9355942,0.0004958592,0.0004279751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006863256,6.689494e-7,0.9600924,0.00001631111,0.00001215404,4.175357e-7,0.002894526,0.000820972,0.0000417198,0.0002442877,0.03574812,0.00005982587],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2846794,0.00002159015,0.000152219,0.00126455,0.001110074,0.0001337611,0.000008407019,0.00001608114,0.7126139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993421,2.71434e-7,0.000009515191,0.0001550801,0.0004403958,0.000002490555,0.000001847839,0.000002109971,0.00004617077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9353499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869396,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009535233055668025,"score_gpt":0.2134191263422014,"score_spread":0.2038838932865334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}