{"id":"W2127080439","doi":"10.1123/jpah.2011-0336","title":"Validity of the Apple iPhone®/iPod Touch® as an Accelerometer-Based Physical Activity Monitor: A Proof-of-Concept Study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Physical Activity and Health","topic":"Physical Activity and Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Accelerometer; Energy expenditure; Physical activity; Treadmill; Activity monitor; Metabolic equivalent; Popularity; Computer science; Mobile device; Leverage (statistics); Pedometer; Data collection; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Physical therapy; Psychology; Mathematics; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; World Wide Web; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01994536,0.001365839,0.0008926182,0.0007623294,0.0003907422,0.001712149,0.001583219,0.001574154,0.001980534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05323754,0.0005536742,0.001317644,0.0003300039,0.001368338,0.0011902,0.001309561,0.0009182732,0.0009993832],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005143598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008679384,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005048655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9855804,0.005093947,0.0009314806,0.001754307,0.006346654,0.0002931199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668287,0.01856788,0.003588764,0.002024865,0.008287784,0.0007019356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02728947,0.01790292,0.4971614,0.005634807,0.003212855,0.0009062049,0.003740187,0.004426486,0.1685123,0.001699893,0.005259144,0.2642543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004201386,0.2178772,0.5776632,0.00146625,0.004422149,0.004059591,0.002591541,0.04496711,0.1243981,0.001233566,0.01677934,0.0003406399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662027,0.001409947,0.02666881,0.0004650115,0.0005149106,0.002058096,0.0006503157,0.0001930288,0.001837126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703893,0.0006825538,0.02482188,0.0005280084,0.0001653725,0.001609117,0.0006288461,0.00005469397,0.001120169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01994536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1054825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1074127798025596,"score_gpt":0.400668270334946,"score_spread":0.2932554905323863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}