{"id":"W2127104724","doi":"10.1037/0735-7044.120.4.963","title":"Effect of conditioning method and testing method on strength of lithium-induced taste aversion learning.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral Neuroscience","topic":"Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Conditioning; Taste aversion; Classical conditioning; Water bottle; Psychology; Taste; Cue reactivity; Associative learning; Bottle; Association (psychology); Neuroscience; Developmental psychology; Addiction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001356888,0.0002709885,0.0004075988,0.0004050931,0.0004574215,0.0000666698,0.0005593229,0.00008074009,0.00001447164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002024235,0.0002331934,0.00008634079,0.001570126,0.0006890735,0.0003809157,0.0003010069,0.0006235329,0.000005975322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002045983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006866037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008747572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.488361e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951755,0.001891273,0.0004485601,0.001036413,0.0008871813,0.0005610327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996217,0.00287617,0.0003842225,0.0002870654,0.00008416556,0.0001514353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001057865,0.0002075109,0.00792396,0.00003620584,1.752377e-7,0.00009059531,0.00002365768,0.0005536223,0.9838219,0.0001378792,0.00001440278,0.007084335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006720625,0.005731892,0.007696754,0.00004054909,0.00002548003,0.0001068589,0.000006268312,0.006338146,0.9791114,0.00002623,0.00007677606,0.0001675247],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982454,0.000004617503,0.0003865071,0.00004317139,0.0003327921,0.0004269638,0.00002007806,0.0000745884,0.0004659301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989138,0.00000704178,0.0005715047,0.0001429832,0.00002571554,0.00001470473,4.994222e-7,0.00002386128,0.0002998867],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00691681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9509349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08825768853177272,"score_gpt":0.4290086227852472,"score_spread":0.3407509342534744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}