{"id":"W2127143815","doi":"10.1017/s0022112010004386","title":"The mechanism of detonation attenuation by a porous medium and its subsequent re-initiation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Fluid Mechanics","topic":"Combustion and Detonation Processes","field":"Engineering","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Detonation; Shock wave; Attenuation; Mechanics; Materials science; Porous medium; Front (military); Wave propagation; Reflection (computer programming); Shock (circulatory); Diffraction; Porosity; Optics; Physics; Explosive material; Chemistry; Composite material; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005630155,0.00007885049,0.0001145324,0.0001051791,0.00005519014,0.0000187523,0.0001192676,0.00006413948,0.00002459656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001656633,0.00006263378,0.00003314946,0.0001332446,0.000004641539,0.0003029999,0.00001410687,0.0001022175,0.000001790945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005401473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004229102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":6.527721e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004917832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991063,0.00002855621,0.0004242762,0.0000533511,0.0003023235,0.00008521545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990975,0.0000662137,0.0002410436,0.00007101881,0.0004718482,0.0000523951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009738117,0.0001278659,0.00001506855,0.0002173542,0.0001810292,0.00001019156,0.003279441,0.0009173465,0.5327179,0.4390771,0.002182459,0.02117691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006844393,0.0002361464,0.00008833582,0.00006036209,0.00006131946,0.00006704781,0.0004676634,0.1318391,0.8293645,0.03589759,0.001087146,0.0001462644],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2361396,0.006656706,0.7531549,0.0008411249,0.001893625,0.0002915148,0.00001335045,0.0001008435,0.0009084067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967616,0.002446719,0.0006835599,0.0000443979,0.00002876587,0.000003003563,0.000002565577,0.00001169052,0.00001774648],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.760622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2554131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02390264161293118,"score_gpt":0.2217014351061385,"score_spread":0.1977987934932073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}