{"id":"W2127165453","doi":"10.1016/j.jpag.2006.05.005","title":"Revisiting the Intrauterine Contraceptive Device in Adolescents","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Intrauterine device; Family planning; Population; Patient satisfaction; Long-acting reversible contraception; Pediatrics; Obstetrics; Gynecology; Family medicine; Surgery; Research methodology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002841538,0.0004084237,0.0006184016,0.001863769,0.001551676,0.002081484,0.0009564023,0.006646239,0.002074207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01138826,0.0003075278,0.0007906849,0.00097689,0.002318411,0.001958578,0.0007120313,0.005885955,0.0005990001],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001534396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005153544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007442153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02133121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977392,0.0007980082,0.0004396475,0.0001549772,0.0006182652,0.0002499395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933334,0.004337504,0.0007055859,0.0002069052,0.0008835242,0.0005330646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002972294,0.0004691159,0.1189796,0.002875216,0.00008015614,0.3529629,0.006074173,0.0007750071,0.003750421,0.03144474,0.08307863,0.3992128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007134223,0.0005743747,0.03145188,0.006225466,0.0002303328,0.3337544,0.008843067,0.0006245574,0.003711922,0.003606929,0.6108235,0.00008236569],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.173978,0.2921465,0.005976239,0.4084812,0.04124811,0.0001980113,0.0002829928,0.0001557097,0.07753331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5471199,0.2771643,0.00911515,0.1037842,0.04734669,0.0001490157,0.0001927137,0.0001448021,0.01498328],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007442153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01502764,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01359532910910541,"score_gpt":0.2809974218644805,"score_spread":0.2674020927553751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}