{"id":"W2127227053","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2008.05.006","title":"An inner face advantage in children’s recognition of familiar peers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","topic":"Face Recognition and Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Face (sociological concept); Developmental psychology; Face perception; Facial recognition system; Cognitive science; Perception; Neuroscience; Linguistics; Pattern recognition (psychology)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009079744,0.0003279186,0.0003826976,0.0006181809,0.0002800683,0.001109656,0.0003841569,0.0005948056,0.004594945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005390347,0.000313271,0.0002627439,0.0002211115,0.0008171705,0.0009869561,0.0008736873,0.0006433664,0.0005035945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002878862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003019981,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002776343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002917671,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992524,0.00007346189,0.00004700229,0.0001682557,0.0003252159,0.0001336097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968415,0.001333017,0.0007610953,0.0004124297,0.0002932172,0.0003586879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002895223,0.0005161903,0.2879419,0.0002636186,0.000147802,0.004303964,0.01058316,0.0002795883,0.6465664,0.002004498,0.001151893,0.04334569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003817858,0.0002604059,0.9653175,0.00002456202,0.00005592916,0.002837792,0.00193299,0.0002558218,0.02812416,0.0004969892,0.000631432,0.00002420741],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980683,0.00005056824,0.00007015083,0.00003194447,0.000006420612,0.000002041143,0.00003066277,0.000008267723,0.001731784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991851,0.00004750079,0.0001796395,0.00002506876,0.000005215774,0.000005768185,0.00004189252,0.00001418379,0.0004955255],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004594945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05094593132577586,"score_gpt":0.3583439628555362,"score_spread":0.3073980315297604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}