{"id":"W2127327506","doi":"10.2147/clep.s9242","title":"Interpreting meta-analysis according to the adequacy of sample size. An example using isoniazid chemoprophylaxis for tuberculosis in purified protein derivative negative HIV-infected individuals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology","field":"Medicine","cited_by":280,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Medicine; Chemoprophylaxis; Randomized controlled trial; Sample size determination; Tuberculosis; Isoniazid; Placebo; Clinical trial; Systematic review; Internal medicine; MEDLINE; Statistics; Pathology; Alternative medicine; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02590763,0.0004757251,0.005716105,0.0005337212,0.0001905458,0.00001553384,0.000690287,0.0007850743,0.0005591856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4530899,0.0003036605,0.00229252,0.001716384,0.0008059877,0.0001674189,0.000431227,0.001908901,0.00001297281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009106284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002648208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009120658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002639002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864323,0.006778297,0.003881275,0.00141377,0.0002485599,0.001245816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8174026,0.177265,0.001694667,0.001906333,0.0008462104,0.0008852222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00143027,0.0006687925,0.9397191,0.0001001235,0.03161997,0.000004263079,0.001090156,0.0008153397,0.01790001,0.001424261,0.000325825,0.004901843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004158953,0.005482469,0.865639,0.00008840935,0.03469099,0.00002425149,0.002168183,0.04990478,0.008595473,0.02606341,0.002163088,0.00102104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9505552,0.0001158302,0.02323616,0.0226802,0.0001294498,0.002995043,0.0001960547,0.000048439,0.0000436205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8471138,0.00001508908,0.1455106,0.00626337,0.0002419905,0.0007244194,0.00007020873,0.00004462649,0.00001585595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4271823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999415,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3444160565258672,"score_gpt":0.4962971333126018,"score_spread":0.1518810767867346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}