{"id":"W2127354632","doi":"10.1167/11.8.17","title":"Examining the influence of task set on eye movements and fixations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vision","topic":"Visual Attention and Saliency Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Eye Institute; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts","keywords":"Saccade; Eye movement; Fixation (population genetics); Perception; Task (project management); Set (abstract data type); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Visual search; Computer science; Communication; Computer vision; Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004015166,0.00003926013,0.00006341062,0.00008801088,0.00007379347,0.00002431659,0.0002058804,0.00001812491,0.000006166597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005304665,0.00002358584,0.00002478124,0.0001146319,0.00002286083,0.0003566946,0.00005108322,0.00008416847,0.000003318509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008815697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001164799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005735403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.808208e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993865,0.00005151294,0.0002262114,0.00006206539,0.0002213959,0.00005234845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994324,0.00003369145,0.0002821942,0.000112939,0.000108319,0.00003049526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002366467,0.001109393,0.1091026,0.00007314797,0.0001451725,0.00004257413,0.04037533,0.003535593,0.5506254,0.01542154,0.001450048,0.2778826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002089767,0.0009399725,0.9925951,0.00008260593,0.000003793772,0.00001116325,0.0001296147,0.002028975,0.002585924,0.001197901,0.0001821974,0.00003381813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867758,0.00001560755,0.01267252,0.0001005764,0.0001351525,0.0000302588,3.527205e-7,0.000004391758,0.0002653363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986579,0.00002266556,0.001113029,0.0001492204,0.0000133378,3.329792e-7,5.333925e-8,0.000001508021,0.00004195595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8834925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09618028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04713570860952518,"score_gpt":0.3165040751310758,"score_spread":0.2693683665215506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}