{"id":"W2127484779","doi":"10.1590/s0104-65002000000200004","title":"Missing and declining affordances: are these appropriate concepts?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society","topic":"Usability and User Interface Design","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro; University of Waterloo; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Affordance; Rhetoric; Framing (construction); Dimension (graph theory); Cognitive dimensions of notations; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Cognition; Cognitive science; Psychology; Linguistics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008679789,0.001448694,0.001288727,0.003792254,0.003125362,0.007978697,0.002631982,0.004444635,0.006361343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04030166,0.0008685944,0.001086786,0.003128429,0.05513041,0.05680552,0.007648635,0.006488589,0.0008151298],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002499675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002168251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002452139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001795494,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909126,0.004656487,0.0007140129,0.001318268,0.00178325,0.0006153927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827889,0.009365605,0.002123612,0.002303786,0.002329864,0.00108826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008888456,0.00002830771,0.001467348,0.0004417737,0.00001328269,0.000212742,0.04683917,0.0001400733,0.0006741728,0.9211648,0.001280311,0.02764923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003092948,0.00007904547,0.001719629,0.000699255,0.00002634325,0.00086277,0.03823132,0.0008787501,0.0004775848,0.9141576,0.0427723,0.00006451048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1516062,0.03981474,0.5331065,0.08301186,0.002749032,0.0004402534,0.0004143113,0.0006907491,0.1881664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9333724,0.005024074,0.05322391,0.002505035,0.0005059027,0.0004252651,0.000124506,0.00025425,0.004564653],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008679789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04590368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01948351555290301,"score_gpt":0.264593819414717,"score_spread":0.245110303861814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}