{"id":"W2127576020","doi":"10.1353/cja.2005.0004","title":"Theorizing about Aging Well: Constructing a Narrative","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement","topic":"Aging and Gerontology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Meaning (existential); Negotiation; Epistemology; Successful aging; Relation (database); Process (computing); Sociology; Psychology; Narrative inquiry; Conceptual framework; Period (music); Conceptual blending; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Computer science; Social science; Cognition; Linguistics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002230952,0.0004040557,0.0004715905,0.0008418397,0.001435714,0.0003205374,0.000627766,0.0001793248,0.004384798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002870703,0.0004084763,0.0001865007,0.0003836308,0.0003392434,0.0001985033,0.00003169813,0.001510292,0.0002971063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001586438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007352025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01959163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34017,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959963,0.0006306731,0.0006395967,0.0006221999,0.000153486,0.001957736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962825,0.0003689194,0.0003053743,0.0005048201,0.0002456511,0.002292801],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009203195,0.0001223427,0.06525628,0.00009918087,0.001186817,0.01451812,0.3973157,0.0008384148,0.0001385972,0.2192963,0.05237671,0.2487595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001895972,0.0002671902,0.00912119,0.001058554,0.00008328493,0.008479162,0.1022457,0.0003244539,0.00008249892,0.0006759031,0.8747658,0.001000288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8769475,0.002077823,0.0003440721,0.02194748,0.00243641,0.0002915136,0.00002319577,0.0000625772,0.09586943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883304,0.00002297626,0.0005835344,0.002262794,0.001567001,0.00003398872,0.00001067357,0.00007561773,0.007112978],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8223891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998643,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01829649587332127,"score_gpt":0.2878652589340443,"score_spread":0.269568763060723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}