{"id":"W2127614768","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0633.2005.00084.x","title":"Population viability and perturbation analyses in remnant populations of the Andean catfish <i>Astroblepus ubidiai</i>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Of Freshwater Fish","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Vital rates; Population; Population viability analysis; Ecology; Population growth; Catfish; Small population size; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Population dynamics of fisheries; Allee effect; Population model; Habitat; Fishery; Endangered species; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003782075,0.0001280625,0.0001078649,0.0004028522,0.0002305641,0.0002077555,0.0001612162,0.0001041481,0.0006170118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001263469,0.00007303645,0.0001969111,0.0001733211,0.0002403812,0.0001780124,0.0003067337,0.0001481735,0.00004721929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004158472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00615597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005282118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998896,0.00003300437,0.000009963803,0.00003811227,0.00001665089,0.00001260761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996294,0.0001280209,0.0001092047,0.00004571035,0.00006015875,0.00002757311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003708536,0.000103389,0.9417863,0.0000261359,0.0001115678,0.0002545598,0.0005445434,0.01212974,0.03200562,0.0005381893,0.00006710594,0.01206188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001035247,0.0001925891,0.9775286,0.000003796888,0.00002693682,0.0001825271,0.0002846291,0.01888906,0.002479808,0.0002636708,0.0001271562,0.0000108763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997995,0.000004512402,0.0001198523,0.000001601982,2.121956e-7,0.000001366058,0.00001569042,7.803e-7,0.000056492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997833,0.000003203149,0.0001191212,9.114656e-7,2.387475e-7,0.00000323628,0.00005464229,2.979797e-7,0.00003504358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00615597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01224029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02046842210644032,"score_gpt":0.2552416273616008,"score_spread":0.2347732052551605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}