{"id":"W2127811796","doi":"10.1002/jae.712","title":"Poverty in America 1970–1990: who did gain ground? An application of stochastic dominance criteria employing simultaneous inequality tests in a partial panel","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Econometrics","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Stochastic dominance; Poverty; Economics; Dominance (genetics); Econometrics; Optimism; Consumption (sociology); Inequality; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Distribution (mathematics); Panel data; Demographic economics; Development economics; Mathematics; Sociology; Economic growth; Psychology; Social science; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00409489,0.0001980627,0.0007635875,0.0008011982,0.0001347182,0.00008079781,0.0004237774,0.0001771664,0.00005106367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002553151,0.0002008835,0.0001068071,0.002259458,0.0001815958,0.0004952952,0.0000366089,0.0003772243,0.000006160495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006568143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002764954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002102395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001150008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969071,0.0003289005,0.001530972,0.0003185084,0.0004361474,0.0004783661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967125,0.001333679,0.001295083,0.0002803959,0.000180642,0.0001976788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004577206,0.01114336,0.3310491,0.0008179948,0.0002308413,0.0001466758,0.1371482,0.1433143,0.005195635,0.150178,0.0005525364,0.2156461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02784585,0.004770374,0.5298282,0.0006852971,0.0003509847,0.00007393675,0.07967218,0.1135709,0.002637319,0.1941567,0.04011755,0.00629071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9754288,0.000105052,0.02087874,0.0001128417,0.0002528315,0.0004073529,0.00002268599,0.00001182613,0.002779934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980417,0.0001280099,0.001314517,0.0002913765,0.0001779047,0.00001706258,0.000003343119,0.00001759947,0.00000851946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2093554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.819179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06011311725516307,"score_gpt":0.3305003450293374,"score_spread":0.2703872277741743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}