{"id":"W2127840114","doi":"10.1109/iscas.2003.1205774","title":"An efficient split-radix FFT algorithm","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Digital Filter Design and Implementation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Twiddle factor; Radix (gastropod); Fast Fourier transform; Prime-factor FFT algorithm; Split-radix FFT algorithm; Algorithm; Computer science; Kronecker product; Cooley–Tukey FFT algorithm; Arithmetic; Lookup table; Mathematics; Parallel computing; Kronecker delta; Fourier transform; Fourier analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001658902,0.00007525534,0.00005820816,0.00005456982,0.00005189361,0.0003091936,0.0003210156,0.00001534161,0.0001060254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006159819,0.00006448061,0.00002611894,0.0002053212,0.00001151842,0.0005213506,0.00002448981,0.00002680152,0.0002149953],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002073091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002934786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008572012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.67078e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992161,0.00004022393,0.0001278246,0.0002392391,0.0001811225,0.0001954426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994826,0.00001568565,0.00002296663,0.0003464856,0.00003004951,0.0001022193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[4.347962e-7,0.0001258662,0.00005456002,0.000001711075,0.000004519709,0.000005936726,0.0002739735,0.00005973345,0.0009372666,0.751012,0.001889404,0.2456346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006988008,0.0004443841,0.001614879,0.000005421861,0.000004132132,0.00004993594,0.0001320023,0.8910601,0.02673595,0.01370097,0.06511689,0.0004364937],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003884797,0.000008880317,0.9410883,0.00006781002,0.0002254159,0.00009383432,0.000001344353,0.0001387719,0.0544908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.336651,9.869559e-7,0.661168,0.0006899779,0.00002210178,0.000007629703,0.000005575332,0.00000612308,0.001448618],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8910004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2981561,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01850469479199976,"score_gpt":0.2714997838956649,"score_spread":0.2529950891036652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}