{"id":"W2127915776","doi":"10.1016/j.jalz.2014.05.910","title":"P2‐233: ITEM RESPONSE THEORY ANALYSIS OF THE MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alzheimer s & Dementia","topic":"Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Montreal Cognitive Assessment; Item response theory; Differential item functioning; Rasch model; Psychology; Cognition; Dementia; Clinical psychology; Cognitive impairment; Audiology; Psychometrics; Medicine; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01604493,0.002061486,0.001425991,0.004066104,0.0006814348,0.001931759,0.002073436,0.000662663,0.01284556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05814305,0.0006026082,0.004395217,0.004736787,0.0006098272,0.001012378,0.001640877,0.001560241,0.002437175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001059416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001537695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00392151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003149641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9815301,0.0122731,0.0009388222,0.001687358,0.003251097,0.0003195001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789442,0.01503792,0.001308205,0.001636385,0.002909024,0.000164259],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004258775,0.002367431,0.3439751,0.002095652,0.00721744,0.0007429904,0.006056941,0.03259975,0.006043425,0.03385249,0.05387396,0.506916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006958186,0.00278632,0.5618655,0.0003875711,0.001004922,0.0005992227,0.002278173,0.3538473,0.004861608,0.03553225,0.03577369,0.0003677205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4253984,0.0003208557,0.5124297,0.0004994195,0.0002352545,0.0193342,0.01927362,0.00356948,0.01893919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6868514,0.0001389477,0.2629207,0.0001785658,0.00004928208,0.03543811,0.009676956,0.0007009103,0.004045061],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01604493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08485472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01945293345088569,"score_gpt":0.330457544824595,"score_spread":0.3110046113737093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}