{"id":"W2128089549","doi":"10.1177/0002716203254765","title":"Using Random Allocation to Evaluate Social Interventions: Three Recent U.K. Examples","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Medical Research Council; University of East Anglia; Society for the Study of French History; Health Technology Assessment Programme; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Disadvantaged; Intervention (counseling); Randomized controlled trial; Hostility; Psychology; Clinical trial; Alternative medicine; Medical education; Medicine; Social psychology; Nursing; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1814862,0.0009427426,0.002193622,0.004054016,0.001639013,0.004249376,0.002101409,0.006315421,0.002249846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.330337,0.001084156,0.002842131,0.008228907,0.0091325,0.005565949,0.004510698,0.005891893,0.0006352009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006960983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007574395,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007348623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008270988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7473918,0.2173276,0.01522195,0.003219578,0.01603122,0.000807883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5579317,0.3974923,0.01241615,0.01220464,0.0191879,0.0007673272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001315442,0.0002378884,0.001720416,0.009884635,0.0005979383,0.000246579,0.002556123,0.002733149,0.0003188291,0.4529173,0.02753176,0.4999399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005324832,0.002291966,0.005332783,0.02785814,0.001591302,0.001951145,0.001276206,0.007665331,0.002946166,0.3317566,0.6115291,0.0004764968],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01174435,0.5099217,0.2661988,0.1349876,0.005483928,0.003699453,0.0004914615,0.0003556608,0.06711708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1366152,0.2590266,0.532263,0.0509701,0.002175499,0.01362129,0.0002555337,0.0004391131,0.004633681],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1814862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9598021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6376301672771683,"score_gpt":0.6012284958017837,"score_spread":0.03640167147538453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}