{"id":"W2128166757","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-57-5-1053","title":"Mercury in the Sudbury River (Massachusetts, U.S.A.): pollution history and a synthesis of recent research","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mercury (programming language); Wetland; Environmental chemistry; Environmental science; Biota; Pollution; Sink (geography); Food chain; Hydrology (agriculture); Chemistry; Ecology; Geology; Biology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006605476,0.0005577067,0.0006465393,0.004437189,0.0007569621,0.002129146,0.0004757284,0.0007949565,0.001638125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009618331,0.0002620779,0.000329642,0.009935241,0.0006864253,0.002104441,0.0005984762,0.0004574572,0.0003150309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003382832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003666134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1030579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2168168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997782,0.00003398707,0.00003395104,0.00006771762,0.00006032295,0.00002579642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993284,0.0002056828,0.0001825534,0.00001352672,0.0002326017,0.00003729661],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001579281,0.00006071114,0.04081884,0.02815091,0.0003952503,0.001155652,0.002887039,0.0009213382,0.008174448,0.002903672,0.01651903,0.8978553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009650486,0.0003615486,0.2716298,0.009298475,0.0006616477,0.001686978,0.003399966,0.0002987677,0.002062807,0.001574904,0.7089437,0.00007185259],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005994796,0.991564,0.0001354935,0.0009775424,0.0001545517,0.000003488903,0.00008899313,0.000006147792,0.001074832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01559305,0.982723,0.0002134988,0.0002954979,0.0002764166,0.000006251867,0.0001084231,0.000002256611,0.0007815848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1030579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2049162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05847436817489379,"score_gpt":0.2725135096061105,"score_spread":0.2140391414312167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}