{"id":"W2128248024","doi":"10.1177/0146621609336540","title":"An Iterative Maximum a Posteriori Estimation of Proficiency Level to Detect Multiple Local Likelihood Maxima","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Psychological Measurement","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Maximum a posteriori estimation; Estimator; Maxima; Maximum likelihood; Mathematics; Statistics; Focus (optics); A priori and a posteriori; Restricted maximum likelihood; M-estimator; Maximum likelihood sequence estimation; Estimation theory; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008970705,0.0003241305,0.0006146411,0.000499821,0.000181227,0.0001589945,0.001187154,0.0001845597,0.000145951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01201443,0.0002167376,0.000135042,0.002376785,0.0001185483,0.0001494927,0.00008204571,0.0002538236,0.0001252444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001129493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003368443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009326013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004888982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938284,0.0004766414,0.001258114,0.001184705,0.002645048,0.0006070479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959558,0.001591022,0.0004522904,0.00104277,0.0006090562,0.0003490623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003952125,0.0004750317,0.0007481046,0.000003127332,0.000008281066,0.000004027128,0.0003432378,0.0008976628,0.07339801,0.0004868015,0.000262995,0.9229775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001803098,0.005761698,0.7897471,0.00005121161,0.00002110837,0.00002043149,0.0008258669,0.003081809,0.02321674,0.1745421,0.0003452505,0.0005835426],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3451758,0.00007749622,0.6483945,0.0004313317,0.0002655803,0.0008205438,0.00001165357,0.00008748691,0.004735601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8092932,0.000002014155,0.1896766,0.0009018435,0.00004679634,0.00006251227,0.000002062257,0.000008688827,0.000006283319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.922394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4601168525429778,"score_gpt":0.4576214468831099,"score_spread":0.002495405659867944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}