{"id":"W2128350152","doi":"10.1109/tvt.2007.895596","title":"Simple Efficient Methods for Generating Independent and Bivariate Nakagami- $m$ Fading Envelope Samples","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology","topic":"Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Nakagami distribution; Fading; Bivariate analysis; Envelope (radar); Fading distribution; Mathematics; Weibull fading; Algorithm; Statistics; Computer science; Electronic engineering; Telecommunications; Engineering; Decoding methods; Rayleigh fading","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000671169,0.0002030204,0.0002255298,0.0005916632,0.0002648854,0.000031323,0.0001134161,0.0002835824,0.00001559125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002130413,0.0002102224,0.00007692873,0.0003115494,0.00004741218,0.00004132431,0.000003058733,0.0003231272,0.000004739703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008963249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001290609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008480039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002330708,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99883,0.00002784259,0.0003564071,0.0003082233,0.00009667901,0.0003808159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994562,0.0001379539,0.00004105442,0.0002254958,0.00006671111,0.00007254509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006380689,0.000018212,0.000003502204,0.00002879226,0.0000513917,0.000001944993,0.00009632803,0.4167886,0.4226008,0.0001378195,0.000001733808,0.1602645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002865761,0.00003924931,0.000006432565,0.00001281599,0.00002805965,0.00001873071,0.00008600326,0.4689293,0.5294648,0.0003384002,0.0006367581,0.000152793],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2496406,0.0002395093,0.7489991,0.00004626635,0.0002587485,0.0002953086,0.000009910907,0.0004852666,0.00002529915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7632743,0.00004973926,0.2364915,0.00004545186,0.00002127177,0.0000646126,0.000003560477,0.00003884446,0.00001071419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5136338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8572622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02568351305858282,"score_gpt":0.2921617413508383,"score_spread":0.2664782282922555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}