{"id":"W2128350152","doi":"10.1109/tvt.2007.895596","title":"Simple Efficient Methods for Generating Independent and Bivariate Nakagami- $m$ Fading Envelope Samples","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology","topic":"Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Nakagami distribution; Fading; Bivariate analysis; Envelope (radar); Fading distribution; Mathematics; Weibull fading; Algorithm; Statistics; Computer science; Electronic engineering; Telecommunications; Engineering; Decoding methods; Rayleigh fading","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00133086,0.001180771,0.0007723586,0.0009625143,0.0004395586,0.0008041338,0.001247245,0.0007031816,0.005106408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007547995,0.0005128811,0.0007234253,0.000900212,0.0004758748,0.001067208,0.001151509,0.001009505,0.00240185],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003921887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007708678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007407597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001573773,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989731,0.0003179489,0.0000688366,0.00009600636,0.0004973956,0.00004667282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997428,0.001462615,0.000252315,0.0004473247,0.0003576906,0.00005208243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003580608,0.0001494336,0.001471349,0.0004011441,0.0001239111,0.0001925606,0.0003339672,0.1771581,0.03820503,0.06250536,0.003609326,0.7154917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001104188,0.0001405704,0.0009578329,0.00005849885,0.00005433331,0.0006621021,0.00006654809,0.9206851,0.03763659,0.02691375,0.01261271,0.0001016367],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009669908,0.00004762724,0.9982219,0.00001429905,0.00001007149,0.00003630591,0.00002490887,0.0002099129,0.0004679035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03993148,0.0002055149,0.9580576,0.00002762813,0.000032287,0.0001913795,0.0001652652,0.0001323117,0.00125641],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005106408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01708269,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02568351305858282,"score_gpt":0.2921617413508383,"score_spread":0.2664782282922555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}