{"id":"W2128376701","doi":"10.1109/tem.2005.861804","title":"Antecedents and outcomes of strategic IS alignment: an empirical investigation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","topic":"Information Technology Governance and Strategy","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":510,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic alignment; Empirical research; Knowledge management; Strategic planning; Strategic management; Argument (complex analysis); Organizational performance; Control (management); Business; Process (computing); Process management; Computer science; Marketing; Strategic financial management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006088301,0.0004536445,0.0006586371,0.003451863,0.00211349,0.003389959,0.0009978699,0.001324041,0.009185211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03018417,0.0006743904,0.0006346024,0.003905435,0.002332367,0.002513973,0.002780871,0.002533694,0.0006406753],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001487844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003474912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003033685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003626207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958355,0.001732798,0.0003556703,0.0003958635,0.001030774,0.0006493507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9249469,0.04896413,0.01446116,0.002407215,0.003897476,0.00532315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001352057,0.002455156,0.9813927,0.0001249542,0.00006356349,0.0003368584,0.002785041,0.0003235834,0.00028052,0.00352843,0.0002271987,0.008346686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003220208,0.0005535045,0.9808937,0.0001125188,0.00009651273,0.000209822,0.01124924,0.002545547,0.0004561089,0.003004985,0.0008252437,0.00002061122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944027,0.0001367322,0.0004299868,0.0003171227,0.000007738445,0.0001033072,0.0001163361,0.000008622303,0.004477418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987137,0.0001833076,0.0004960106,0.00004543979,0.00001182978,0.00009144656,0.0001571595,0.000004003908,0.0002972193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009185211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03219843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01757834386844208,"score_gpt":0.2226329476031793,"score_spread":0.2050546037347372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}