{"id":"W2128388249","doi":"","title":"Assessing academic writing: L1 English content professors’ accommodation to non-standard rhetorical organization in L2 student writing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Linguistics; Academic writing; Second language writing; Rhetorical modes; Rhetoric; Sociology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Second language","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001351091,0.0004463794,0.0007648232,0.00226974,0.001631268,0.0009566689,0.001020948,0.0003606366,0.0003012613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005822597,0.0004933226,0.000164839,0.001281803,0.0002710078,0.001372952,0.0004304316,0.002136296,0.0000407696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00174931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007467457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007510234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04336901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952764,0.0007310549,0.0007692954,0.0009491685,0.001359265,0.0009148372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960648,0.0003054569,0.0004331559,0.0005158809,0.002436381,0.0002443235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001116022,0.0009036936,0.3395169,0.0009838307,0.001554925,0.002322158,0.509681,0.00005243984,0.003715176,0.1308625,0.004868992,0.004422325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009717854,0.0003233351,0.1331351,0.00147647,0.0002871844,0.000002553246,0.8498574,0.00001892917,0.004752554,0.000168136,0.008088793,0.0009177379],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7616258,0.0001260989,0.00002396154,0.0001361536,0.00145499,0.0007762481,0.0000134489,0.0001175404,0.2357258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578096,0.0001239177,0.00001769969,0.00001525478,0.001942589,0.00001801168,0.0002957422,0.00009285037,0.03968434],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3401764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1011696323982486,"score_gpt":0.3621981619079693,"score_spread":0.2610285295097207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}