{"id":"W2128390230","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2005.1652","title":"Inferring causality in brain images: a perturbation approach","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Stimulus (psychology); Neuroscience; Positron emission tomography; Causality (physics); Computer science; Human brain; Neuroimaging; Electroencephalography; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Physics; Stimulation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003042991,0.0008269803,0.001283277,0.003793043,0.0003357702,0.002634347,0.001832562,0.001755396,0.001578279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009065633,0.0004970877,0.0005495253,0.003100198,0.005177411,0.00608876,0.001344111,0.001541744,0.0007560779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001015921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007317592,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001092161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009724369,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988855,0.0004844574,0.00008324901,0.0001841441,0.0003437954,0.00001888933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955817,0.00344843,0.0002135751,0.0003549894,0.0003612457,0.00004003232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004506491,0.00002414821,0.0008997048,0.003418084,0.0002267888,0.0004827714,0.0006080004,0.00820587,0.003441845,0.2422852,0.003553128,0.7368094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001879414,0.00007091388,0.002951443,0.001110364,0.0001198353,0.00207891,0.0005933776,0.01495875,0.003413117,0.8427853,0.1317935,0.0001057365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004381171,0.4455515,0.525272,0.00652067,0.0005213853,0.00009944058,0.000144869,0.0003306149,0.0171784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1341399,0.6296089,0.2289319,0.00128299,0.001233698,0.0002428684,0.000191318,0.0000834571,0.004284858],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003793043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01609308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2440671714287956,"score_gpt":0.3788703435571302,"score_spread":0.1348031721283347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}