{"id":"W2128467109","doi":"10.1111/caje.12029","title":"A swing state theory of trade protection in the Electoral College","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Protectionism; Swing; Reputation; Voting; Competition (biology); Incentive; State (computer science); Electoral college; Economics; Free trade; Microeconomics; Political science; International trade; Law; Politics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009713961,0.0001017054,0.0002881127,0.0007968678,0.001153368,0.002384312,0.0003273886,0.0005998354,0.02003048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00300078,0.0001453874,0.0003746913,0.000788498,0.002052627,0.001451014,0.001320703,0.0008329889,0.0008134018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009975976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005715766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00193668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001751464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994445,0.0001825245,0.00001791177,0.00008410902,0.0000809631,0.0001899371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983443,0.000614384,0.0003536727,0.0001945647,0.0001616657,0.0003314186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001558184,0.000100929,0.01858975,0.00003548282,0.00001938407,0.0001977445,0.001229369,0.008179508,0.0008659244,0.954427,0.001664906,0.01453416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001164974,0.0002150655,0.03678491,0.00006585904,0.00004436143,0.0002862678,0.003144807,0.07337581,0.0007804835,0.8709228,0.01423374,0.00002949623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8393627,0.0003335426,0.0382539,0.002748159,0.00004450184,0.00004335342,0.0001507157,0.00004415527,0.119019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967436,0.0000426335,0.0003028713,0.00002439333,0.00001471539,0.000005391289,0.00001526097,0.000001753643,0.002849406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06700861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1700931872752575,"score_gpt":0.229389823749841,"score_spread":0.05929663647458355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}