{"id":"W2128467109","doi":"10.1111/caje.12029","title":"A swing state theory of trade protection in the Electoral College","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Protectionism; Swing; Reputation; Voting; Competition (biology); Incentive; State (computer science); Electoral college; Economics; Free trade; Microeconomics; Political science; International trade; Law; Politics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001837262,0.000101746,0.000280316,0.0002853205,0.0001714346,0.00007449587,0.000305618,0.00009605778,0.0001753867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000316883,0.00009480214,0.00009934136,0.0001817211,0.000180301,0.0003973341,0.000003010102,0.0002389918,0.000006812441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001212396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001927643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8096947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982816,0.0004354687,0.0006105013,0.0001125852,0.000004792223,0.000555062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986261,0.0002051416,0.0003471527,0.0001250874,0.00009088279,0.0006056011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002377131,0.00001274922,0.01528469,0.00002302532,0.00003368584,0.0000157349,0.01268996,0.0006136621,0.00007323662,0.9682735,0.0002880717,0.002667884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005810286,0.000499538,0.04730301,0.0001370613,0.00002583312,0.00005892354,0.00627773,0.0005903686,0.0002186284,0.9319768,0.0120059,0.0003252012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.992083,0.00005605858,0.00002229595,0.00597697,0.0003629828,0.0004951469,0.00002816785,0.000002036151,0.0009733671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991964,0.000005189809,0.00002213356,0.0002626397,0.0003126239,0.00003252918,9.733091e-7,0.00001162358,0.0001558848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1875989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3865919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1700931872752575,"score_gpt":0.229389823749841,"score_spread":0.05929663647458355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}