{"id":"W2128493075","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01963.x","title":"Spatial species‐richness gradients across scales: a meta‐analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biogeography","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":748,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; National Center For Environmental Assessment; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Species richness; Biological dispersal; Ecology; Taxon; Productivity; Spatial heterogeneity; Spatial ecology; Habitat; Geography; Biology; Population; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01341788,0.001962713,0.006124952,0.009193937,0.0007439514,0.003075171,0.002481734,0.001341398,0.005647674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02464544,0.001062824,0.02401316,0.01068152,0.0008680567,0.001907023,0.001862872,0.001396464,0.0005565326],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007836157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009930161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004910114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007000234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871357,0.00707529,0.001714812,0.002934527,0.0007244561,0.000415264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9573098,0.03486802,0.003182439,0.002782534,0.001299063,0.0005581065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001391722,0.0000536528,0.1784926,0.02270107,0.7822982,0.000422968,0.0002572842,0.001474649,0.0007350324,0.0003830458,0.00118604,0.01060383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004756996,0.000575388,0.1925664,0.005931876,0.788458,0.000571859,0.0007694998,0.004358865,0.0005342266,0.001915163,0.003740359,0.0001026554],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4187889,0.547634,0.01796443,0.001640053,0.0006453178,0.0003739416,0.0105219,0.0005576705,0.001873777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966353,0.02499424,0.005585348,0.0003451624,0.0001481636,0.0003358926,0.00185565,0.0001142028,0.0002683338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01341788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07096142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02186280280156298,"score_gpt":0.2532102341633801,"score_spread":0.2313474313618171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}