{"id":"W2128493075","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01963.x","title":"Spatial species‐richness gradients across scales: a meta‐analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biogeography","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":748,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; National Center For Environmental Assessment; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Species richness; Biological dispersal; Ecology; Taxon; Productivity; Spatial heterogeneity; Spatial ecology; Habitat; Geography; Biology; Population; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003765757,0.000135424,0.0005123272,0.0002354325,0.0003865738,0.00001396913,0.0002616162,0.00006558209,0.0007640686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002227789,0.00009933295,0.001286694,0.00135437,0.0005932821,0.0001900015,0.000100055,0.0001555056,0.00004540085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004698901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007735391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001129916,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987453,0.00007223164,0.0004107561,0.0001598644,0.0003592793,0.0002526049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992352,0.00007427611,0.0003966625,0.0001385931,0.00004987923,0.0001054115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002146668,0.0001468591,0.9768241,0.000001850919,0.02120866,0.0000516697,0.0006184573,0.0007050029,0.0000718534,0.00001208594,0.000273326,0.00006464673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002672173,0.0001089969,0.9881903,9.471979e-7,0.009919001,0.00005493339,0.0001535162,0.00009687281,0.00005781414,0.0002637324,0.0007711367,0.0001155165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940199,0.0009509897,0.003149978,0.000279496,0.0002088947,0.00005859615,0.00002691779,0.000009764475,0.001295417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980934,0.000597898,0.0009284422,0.0001780315,0.00004174634,0.000003393538,0.000002452885,0.000005193379,0.0001493952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01136619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8366016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02186280280156298,"score_gpt":0.2532102341633801,"score_spread":0.2313474313618171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}