{"id":"W2128507287","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12042","title":"A Natural Experiment in Proposal Power and Electoral Success","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Natural experiment; House of Commons; Lottery; Politics; Power (physics); Commons; Public economics; Natural (archaeology); Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Law; Microeconomics; Parliament; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001044473,0.00007711227,0.0002046965,0.0001412312,0.0001715183,0.0001716458,0.0002594371,0.00002113285,0.00009786586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006756736,0.00005675062,0.00003496542,0.0006626431,0.002926051,0.0006883604,0.00003357349,0.0001814205,0.0000119614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003594669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006684696,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05042945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001137682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977329,0.0002018708,0.0003339131,0.0001390377,0.0006401371,0.0009521684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986169,0.0001477129,0.0001242959,0.00006537932,0.0002792091,0.0007664423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001225258,0.00007611371,0.1721904,0.000002488649,0.000003334259,0.000006067743,0.001917618,5.49523e-7,0.008225113,0.8153899,0.00005446196,0.002121671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002582427,0.0008096384,0.9781818,0.00004815072,0.000005582201,0.00002223724,0.003955743,0.00009975125,0.001907454,0.01423114,0.0002788095,0.0002014822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989925,0.00004327,0.00002391676,0.008332975,0.0001856577,0.0001207919,2.97151e-7,0.00000657318,0.001361528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991046,8.857869e-7,0.0003742363,0.000328286,0.0001425988,0.000004978931,4.000823e-8,0.000003549737,0.00004084583],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8059914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01346896035927531,"score_gpt":0.3608159458175501,"score_spread":0.3473469854582748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}