{"id":"W2128536831","doi":"10.1007/s11238-011-9249-4","title":"Using turn taking to achieve intertemporal cooperation and symmetry in infinitely repeated 2 × 2 games","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Monash University; Australian National University; McGill University; City University of Hong Kong; Purdue University","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Repeated game; Mathematical economics; Dilemma; Path (computing); Prisoner's dilemma; Turn-taking; Stochastic game; Turn (biochemistry); Sequential game; Computer science; Game theory; Economics; Mathematics; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00293581,0.000692154,0.0007120086,0.0004891614,0.0007115849,0.001462894,0.0009996626,0.0009946162,0.002285682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01202996,0.000389184,0.0008227618,0.0002409119,0.002996788,0.002000707,0.001482446,0.0008373824,0.0002576804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001025963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001008547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001316499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001362218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996302,0.002508969,0.0001266473,0.000372622,0.000283543,0.0004062262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900832,0.005676234,0.002444839,0.0009687693,0.0002401999,0.0005867388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001163289,0.0005238031,0.009478962,0.0002497323,0.0003840595,0.001195795,0.002097196,0.3090804,0.03425455,0.6090208,0.0009588383,0.03159252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003382941,0.001181175,0.004907145,0.00003961697,0.00009243553,0.0004989489,0.0006798562,0.4442098,0.005397731,0.5400806,0.002464702,0.0001096377],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8127508,0.0001041817,0.1702979,0.0004073943,0.00002498672,0.0001178011,0.00004088349,0.0001066257,0.01614946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884566,0.00003466673,0.01052064,0.00003712251,0.000005411665,0.00007053408,0.00001244707,0.000008343191,0.0008541847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00293581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01552624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1226923899037441,"score_gpt":0.3860870284441435,"score_spread":0.2633946385403994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}