{"id":"W2128557817","doi":"10.1037/a0013084","title":"Reading aloud: Qualitative differences in the relation between stimulus quality and word frequency as a function of context.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Reading aloud; Stimulus (psychology); Psychology; Word lists by frequency; Cognitive psychology; Word recognition; Communication; Word processing; Information processing; Speech recognition; Computer science; Reading (process); Natural language processing; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006540443,0.0001343363,0.0002034904,0.0005016324,0.0001060227,0.0006592828,0.0002350934,0.0003115887,0.001762968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01288422,0.0002559532,0.0001224105,0.000468521,0.0005073569,0.0006890873,0.0004769631,0.000467909,0.0002630163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002103088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001360869,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006904569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000693618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994166,0.0001821945,0.00003596122,0.0001304285,0.0001897055,0.00004518551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901701,0.007235503,0.001275801,0.0004879326,0.0005754045,0.0002553556],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001044107,0.0001207093,0.02074187,0.0001744587,0.00006338575,0.0001481536,0.001010364,0.0003418952,0.9488508,0.000751409,0.0001655529,0.02658743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005646396,0.0009299204,0.7588571,0.0000233417,0.0001016058,0.000649604,0.0005154106,0.003924423,0.2310839,0.003115963,0.0006853848,0.0000570507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918338,0.0003715793,0.00534998,0.00005654575,0.0000143902,0.00002580404,0.0002222258,0.0001028691,0.002022836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979498,0.00007170591,0.001454975,0.00002833122,0.000005248571,0.00001817484,0.0001140687,0.00004578507,0.0003118737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001762968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005897701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1088960067468049,"score_gpt":0.4211183359352455,"score_spread":0.3122223291884406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}