{"id":"W2128617865","doi":"10.5558/tfc82351-3","title":"A survey of tree species of concern in Canada: the role for genetic conservation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Plant and Fungal Interactions Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Ex situ conservation; Habitat; Genetic diversity; Geography; In situ conservation; Agroforestry; Conservation genetics; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Biodiversity; Perennial plant; Introduced species; Conservation biology; Environmental resource management; Biology; Endangered species; Population; Environmental science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004301303,0.0001306249,0.0001151054,0.001172939,0.002712869,0.0006521185,0.0003514381,0.0002313469,0.001882031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008157985,0.000102838,0.00008459022,0.002143991,0.000474329,0.0002263836,0.0003210415,0.0003170315,0.0001275446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0113878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02106836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9866546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969189,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996654,0.00002027982,0.00001124981,0.00002898654,0.0001705483,0.000103602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986408,0.00009768467,0.0001733922,0.00001454144,0.0006247072,0.000448845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000660983,0.00005920021,0.9165306,0.0003374202,0.00001791018,0.0005631311,0.01125556,0.0001960207,0.005719551,0.0004963031,0.008186073,0.0565721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002512196,0.00004315015,0.9792383,0.00004127418,0.000006776955,0.000157317,0.009094069,0.0001587667,0.0002502922,0.00002716872,0.01097012,0.00001015312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896891,0.0007721441,0.00018125,0.0008250448,0.000009651888,0.00005892307,0.00187733,0.00001885291,0.006567548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993126,0.001068179,0.0007783598,0.0004135776,0.000004211133,0.00002575536,0.0008574856,0.000003510241,0.003722859],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01334536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08262461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02908068370861009,"score_gpt":0.2658081499550494,"score_spread":0.2367274662464393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}