{"id":"W2128620848","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00626.x","title":"The balanced‐growth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass allocation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Functional Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":590,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Allometry; Biology; Biomass (ecology); Nutrient; Shoot; Biomass partitioning; Herbaceous plant; Botany; Growth rate; Irradiance; Dry weight; Unit root; Horticulture; Agronomy; Ecology; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002761009,0.00005534251,0.00008664284,0.00001784257,0.0003724663,0.000005873957,0.00005892864,0.00004920448,0.0004165496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002587345,0.00003225335,0.00001825573,0.0000926813,0.001029548,0.00004517299,0.0000794138,0.00005543857,0.00005397212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002251447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002360808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002242789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001365809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995054,0.00007887682,0.0001195456,0.0001253794,0.00006868755,0.0001021117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985763,0.001255145,0.00007083475,0.0000675893,0.00001359103,0.00001647703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006955818,0.00004260558,0.969748,0.000005798674,0.00007291785,3.955578e-7,0.0002096099,0.0001342614,0.0002955322,0.02358068,0.003898988,0.001941691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043475,0.00004723267,0.9845377,5.352135e-7,0.00001563171,0.000009828415,0.0000660337,0.003174303,0.00002275817,0.01066965,0.0009846864,0.00003685285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.980206,0.0003925978,0.000182989,0.01206271,0.000204363,0.0001217141,0.000002174844,0.000008693949,0.006818736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980761,0.000279787,0.00008477013,0.0003062581,0.00001826372,0.00003348245,9.720817e-7,0.00000279681,0.001197527],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01787012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4560926,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009909239487586055,"score_gpt":0.1812651089664379,"score_spread":0.1713558694788518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}