{"id":"W2128735565","doi":"10.1093/icesjms/fsp287","title":"Can simple be useful and reliable? Using ecological indicators to represent and compare the states of marine ecosystems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICES Journal of Marine Science","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología; Natural Environment Research Council; European Commission; Sight Research UK; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement","keywords":"Marine ecosystem; Ecosystem; Categorization; Set (abstract data type); Environmental resource management; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Ecology; Ecological indicator; Marine conservation; Environmental science; Biology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002156164,0.0001011974,0.0002153699,0.0001345146,0.0002669921,0.0001341632,0.0006867213,0.00002739451,0.002177892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003257623,0.00006063277,0.00002630488,0.0006563934,0.001174834,0.0003192349,0.002816505,0.0003177022,0.000001237703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005744047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006639212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004750674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005701555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983079,0.00005293768,0.0003762583,0.0002372114,0.0007212864,0.0003044267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989442,0.0001657123,0.000272671,0.0002545562,0.00006125025,0.0003016582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002939477,0.00003699101,0.9876464,0.00001105588,0.000004963348,0.00001159078,0.0003464278,0.0001400635,0.003415098,0.00002602568,0.0002986918,0.008033294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000226029,0.0002893485,0.968214,0.000005640285,0.00001023405,0.0001882083,0.0006050054,0.003313742,0.001208839,0.0006756648,0.02515455,0.0001087384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891986,0.000003279955,0.000006462072,0.001408598,0.00009399268,0.0001459309,0.000004126255,0.000003035976,0.00913594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982753,0.00005173432,0.001366621,0.0001135186,0.00004034095,0.000001494012,5.863309e-7,0.000004551889,0.0001458352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02485585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02216170645114483,"score_gpt":0.2861768920595152,"score_spread":0.2640151856083704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}