{"id":"W2128778368","doi":"10.1037/a0034095","title":"Negotiating power: Agenda ordering and the willingness to negotiate in asymmetric intergroup conflicts.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; Status quo; Social psychology; Disadvantaged; Power (physics); Psychology; Preference; Group conflict; Conflict resolution; System justification; Political science; Politics; Economics; Microeconomics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008932436,0.0003421284,0.0002526669,0.001115989,0.001100189,0.004099006,0.0005632524,0.001309049,0.006074003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04316598,0.0002563591,0.0002897478,0.0008668888,0.002950749,0.004979236,0.001808494,0.002289648,0.0006242861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000782945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006091183,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004194423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005750985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956242,0.003062106,0.0001633947,0.0002802589,0.000597467,0.0002725556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748489,0.01682477,0.004926059,0.0008188115,0.001079236,0.001502181],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001844216,0.001543487,0.2593351,0.001238323,0.0003925068,0.00146482,0.0992589,0.005031112,0.01943001,0.3198601,0.003174747,0.2874268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003536378,0.001564099,0.369104,0.0007231274,0.000273283,0.002124418,0.07155742,0.02087691,0.004230947,0.5016325,0.02729211,0.0002675908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8916115,0.001688706,0.01735754,0.002839364,0.0001295845,0.0001034573,0.00005138314,0.00002485606,0.08619364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960693,0.0002201636,0.002269256,0.0001753067,0.0000379288,0.00004911919,0.00002989082,0.00000914145,0.001139915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008932436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04723984,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04433935233600471,"score_gpt":0.356335943208813,"score_spread":0.3119965908728082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}