{"id":"W2128778368","doi":"10.1037/a0034095","title":"Negotiating power: Agenda ordering and the willingness to negotiate in asymmetric intergroup conflicts.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; Status quo; Social psychology; Disadvantaged; Power (physics); Psychology; Preference; Group conflict; Conflict resolution; System justification; Political science; Politics; Economics; Microeconomics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002195546,0.00009049419,0.00026475,0.0001667095,0.0003827445,0.0001779691,0.0001714343,0.00009808927,0.00008725741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000297978,0.00007177503,0.00006380711,0.0003812276,0.0003115125,0.0002902194,0.00005235141,0.0002616381,0.000004687166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004190118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002352086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002926603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008457238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985546,0.0004729396,0.0003674025,0.0001371795,0.0002295636,0.0002383018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992243,0.0002776831,0.0002524217,0.00004718086,0.0001287028,0.00006968894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006444183,0.0001696183,0.1039198,0.0000480341,0.0001938401,0.00001463445,0.6840996,0.0000181629,0.0001623534,0.1115889,0.002934765,0.09620585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003678114,0.0001183174,0.901791,0.0000255867,0.0000349765,0.000007481812,0.03459772,0.0001171581,0.000001057415,0.003358667,0.05609283,0.0001771117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9535691,0.0004341026,0.0004167178,0.03591529,0.0004968857,0.0002278166,6.343294e-7,0.000007177666,0.008932277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957423,0.0003101001,0.00006064989,0.003406673,0.0003081058,0.000004980907,3.039749e-7,0.000005591938,0.00016136],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7978712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4424167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04433935233600471,"score_gpt":0.356335943208813,"score_spread":0.3119965908728082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}