{"id":"W2128834861","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2012.01705.x","title":"Limited asset market participation and the consumption‐real exchange rate anomaly","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exchange rate; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Uncorrelated; Econometrics; Monetary economics; Interest rate parity; Financial market; Volatility (finance); Asset (computer security); Foreign exchange market; Financial economics; Finance; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003336697,0.0003047154,0.0008560445,0.0006580869,0.0002665822,0.0001886175,0.0003866901,0.0002001024,0.001888596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000345665,0.0003228673,0.0002355966,0.0000895566,0.0003736181,0.001094663,0.00002965131,0.0003292302,0.0001701592],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009258877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002017626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1454218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6849822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971845,0.0001267789,0.001340955,0.0003014235,0.000001501179,0.001044885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961902,0.0003742735,0.00122688,0.0004201065,0.00003698039,0.001751543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002584707,0.0000227681,0.3526093,0.00005857849,0.0003861197,0.0000145119,0.003995774,0.001040849,0.000001221165,0.6359407,0.004474515,0.001197277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006010547,0.0003348695,0.6700186,0.00007309571,0.0001555483,0.0005789691,0.0003714153,0.02959095,0.00002753558,0.1807423,0.1108575,0.001238696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.986451,0.002991219,0.00005493931,0.002962023,0.001507311,0.0003091334,0.0005226336,0.000006882722,0.00519486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945133,0.001940884,0.0001564917,0.001361069,0.0009739223,0.00002804819,0.00002239016,0.00004741939,0.0009564523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5395604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2488266566757295,"score_gpt":0.2074600127862773,"score_spread":0.04136664388945216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}