{"id":"W2128843131","doi":"10.1139/t00-064","title":"Risk-based liquefaction potential evaluation using standard penetration tests","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liquefaction; Artificial neural network; Penetration test; Standard penetration test; Geotechnical engineering; Chart; Engineering; Limit state design; Computer science; Civil engineering; Mathematics; Machine learning; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003294514,0.0009029636,0.0007589694,0.003163326,0.0002318225,0.00116135,0.0008490066,0.0004306595,0.001239485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01285722,0.0002112431,0.0004584769,0.00105901,0.0005503572,0.001694123,0.0006873433,0.0003854689,0.0002659416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001061191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007814346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004839906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004280927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977179,0.000547838,0.0002510248,0.0002600433,0.001148325,0.00007491533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923897,0.003865722,0.001117935,0.0005245426,0.001980731,0.0001213021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007253169,0.0002575643,0.07857215,0.000336678,0.0001630433,0.0003175903,0.000249091,0.6519921,0.0164369,0.004050151,0.00113836,0.245761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000239448,0.0004655203,0.02298607,0.00003513538,0.00003714739,0.0001928912,0.00007990389,0.9515494,0.02091663,0.002661377,0.0009958497,0.00005619208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4031587,0.0002752946,0.5902588,0.00007887919,0.00001092137,0.0002861622,0.0008687041,0.001428009,0.003634606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9216082,0.0001467403,0.07638437,0.00001335465,0.000004211853,0.0001803958,0.0009638324,0.00003840962,0.0006604652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004839906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01742327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01098057944453671,"score_gpt":0.2237245203400242,"score_spread":0.2127439408954875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}