{"id":"W2129152887","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.050090","title":"Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":596,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs","keywords":"Confidence interval; Medicine; Diagnostic accuracy; Meta-analysis; Odds ratio; Publication bias; Statistics; MEDLINE; Diagnostic odds ratio; Retrospective cohort study; Selection bias; Internal medicine; Pathology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5864695810907826,"score_gpt":0.4931121404073415,"score_spread":0.09335744068344115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}