{"id":"W2129295997","doi":"10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.1032","title":"Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Two Methods of Resharpening Periodontal Curets: A Comparative Study","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Periodontology","topic":"Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bevel; Scanning electron microscope; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Dentistry; Sharpening; Analysis of variance; Mathematics; Orthodontics; Materials science; Biomedical engineering; Medicine; Computer science; Composite material; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001530137,0.0004921308,0.000370166,0.002240957,0.0003015438,0.0002165096,0.0002663641,0.0005779634,0.001812798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001440427,0.0002722792,0.0005938629,0.0005724925,0.0003443254,0.0005556939,0.0002876557,0.000246558,0.0002606778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002182856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001509754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003034784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006344059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991742,0.0002277003,0.00009576467,0.00009083503,0.0003388447,0.00007267564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982607,0.0006242467,0.0002825022,0.0001100303,0.000603132,0.0001194821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0112538,0.002810226,0.216972,0.002141024,0.00079092,0.002651894,0.001646113,0.0005962022,0.6344888,0.0002669569,0.0003650034,0.1260171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001925876,0.03185756,0.8018873,0.0001316154,0.0007648804,0.009955772,0.0020724,0.001424641,0.147922,0.0001879868,0.003510734,0.00009241959],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994706,0.002594305,0.001486858,0.00001393184,0.00002198947,0.00006863512,0.00005714163,0.0000158915,0.00103536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923415,0.001857579,0.004313289,0.00003026741,0.00003485406,0.00006947905,0.0001713572,0.00001061625,0.001171067],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002240957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008092225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1164306354508684,"score_gpt":0.4956112972316115,"score_spread":0.3791806617807431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}