{"id":"W2129295997","doi":"10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.1032","title":"Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Two Methods of Resharpening Periodontal Curets: A Comparative Study","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Periodontology","topic":"Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bevel; Scanning electron microscope; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Dentistry; Sharpening; Analysis of variance; Mathematics; Orthodontics; Materials science; Biomedical engineering; Medicine; Computer science; Composite material; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002506722,0.0002005805,0.001105417,0.0003252426,0.00008659879,0.00001414346,0.0001092202,0.00008676242,0.0003044808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005023631,0.000160138,0.0002283244,0.0002552343,0.0001487633,0.0001602413,0.00001981897,0.0002873985,0.000001962995],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002948658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008272317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008144895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002759789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965419,0.00137503,0.001050528,0.0001984918,0.0006017528,0.0002322529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973606,0.00009612205,0.001043404,0.0002084232,0.001165211,0.0001262081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001507023,0.001858372,0.2454112,0.00004283927,0.001219381,0.000087581,0.01911182,0.0001774133,0.7261583,0.0003676757,0.00009912792,0.003959306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03435616,0.01646922,0.2414795,0.0003875996,0.003447088,0.005097615,0.01972282,0.001319221,0.6757793,0.0001378689,0.001418363,0.0003852167],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917495,0.004606855,0.0008023083,0.00006157068,0.0002599663,0.0005187425,0.000003131621,0.000004992683,0.001992961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740155,0.00002002016,0.02575901,0.00003016679,0.00004706443,0.00001171283,0.000004484329,0.00001448417,0.00009752022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.050379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6530237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1164306354508684,"score_gpt":0.4956112972316115,"score_spread":0.3791806617807431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}