{"id":"W2129396254","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2013.00579","title":"Two-Point Orientation Discrimination Versus the Traditional Two-Point Test for Tactile Spatial Acuity Assessment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","topic":"Tactile and Sensory Interactions","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Orientation (vector space); Point (geometry); Task (project management); Two-alternative forced choice; Contrast (vision); Calipers; Psychophysics; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Computer science; Computer vision; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Perception; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006054285,0.0006706115,0.0006942205,0.0008414693,0.0001918558,0.0006459262,0.001205022,0.001210944,0.001780139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01861147,0.0001560195,0.0003604321,0.0005552957,0.001195695,0.001245322,0.001366692,0.001127419,0.0006041149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002992147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003483533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008958525,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957197,0.001222692,0.0004084148,0.000922705,0.001513445,0.0002130755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898731,0.005690822,0.001766282,0.001069214,0.001115264,0.0004854455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01057903,0.001341083,0.3679376,0.001042627,0.0003927632,0.00141854,0.002120449,0.00191193,0.2891735,0.01116238,0.002582868,0.3103372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003011833,0.01125276,0.8557291,0.0002460496,0.0001475358,0.009358588,0.0006516934,0.02396768,0.07875188,0.01344744,0.005865683,0.0002803489],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8947648,0.001518513,0.09686655,0.0003679477,0.0001844826,0.000171558,0.0002534229,0.0003016221,0.005571043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684755,0.0002225396,0.02936296,0.0003198964,0.00006254044,0.000153942,0.00009830268,0.00002824866,0.001276075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006054285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03201848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07829309293098223,"score_gpt":0.3418590076188984,"score_spread":0.2635659146879161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}