{"id":"W2129513663","doi":"10.1175/waf921.1","title":"Forecasting Tornadic Thunderstorm Potential in Alberta Using Environmental Sounding Data. Part I: Wind Shear and Buoyancy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Weather and Forecasting","topic":"Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences","keywords":"Tornado; Thunderstorm; Convective available potential energy; Severe weather; Supercell; Wind shear; Storm; Meteorology; Convective storm detection; Mesocyclone; Geology; Depth sounding; Tropical cyclone; Environmental science; Atmospheric sciences; Climatology; Convection; Wind speed; Geography; Physics; Doppler radar","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003334406,0.0001478832,0.0001795406,0.00007034939,0.0003579951,0.00009357039,0.0001017997,0.00006772196,0.0003551938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003729252,0.000126073,0.00002178017,0.00008337876,0.0001049604,0.0003503202,0.00004977453,0.0001291193,0.000004043633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009563525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009520826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006492399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003305034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988059,0.00005149718,0.0002847931,0.0003657188,0.0001351004,0.0003569809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994662,0.0002260794,0.00008083709,0.0001344007,0.000003035497,0.00008938004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002147501,0.0000149836,0.9608599,0.00001177467,0.000008900467,0.00001375807,0.0002336901,0.02751385,0.0001412475,0.00003842994,0.000005976338,0.01113604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004136627,0.00005157404,0.2463821,0.00002851626,0.00002055267,0.00005292825,0.0002717683,0.7504426,0.000002584311,0.00189011,0.0002489953,0.0001946271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943546,0.0005867117,0.0003618413,0.00002364314,0.0001385154,0.0001254497,0.0000421539,0.00001012346,0.004356975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981891,0.00001159997,0.001201594,0.00003720818,0.000316868,2.756685e-7,0.0001185496,0.00000645932,0.0001183267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7229287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9814609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06727989589921322,"score_gpt":0.2193671229117672,"score_spread":0.1520872270125539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}