{"id":"W2129589962","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2014-0040","title":"Characteristics and distribution of natural flow regimes in Canada: a habitat template approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Biota; Environmental science; Ecology; Flow (mathematics); STREAMS; Geography; Debris flow; Streamflow; Hydrology (agriculture); Physical geography; Geology; Drainage basin; Biology; Mathematics; Meteorology; Computer science; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004057967,0.0001730476,0.0002523303,0.002294856,0.001034608,0.0009482328,0.0005928806,0.0002069834,0.001177064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001912485,0.0001727662,0.0002898948,0.004169308,0.0005090919,0.0002683474,0.0004043259,0.0002031732,0.0001296636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007302035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009803367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.970584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999684,0.00002635408,0.00002042032,0.00006949456,0.0001284183,0.0000712924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989089,0.0001316493,0.0001662252,0.00007105407,0.0005792379,0.0001430415],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005652509,0.00001950811,0.9585763,0.00003680249,0.00006025362,0.0000796238,0.001078414,0.005138037,0.0007333677,0.001017609,0.00182188,0.03138185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004961676,0.00001655829,0.9834879,0.0000175238,0.00001504346,0.00009449895,0.0008860718,0.01289608,0.0001399031,0.0003792589,0.002044189,0.0000179739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894004,0.0001610357,0.003103187,0.00008396162,0.000002632959,0.00004870279,0.005611137,0.0000574082,0.001531522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901767,0.0001879754,0.004150802,0.00001604885,0.000001105428,0.00003553092,0.004867804,0.00001403673,0.0005500887],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02941602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05917847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008794633185068897,"score_gpt":0.1753443855459473,"score_spread":0.1665497523608784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}