{"id":"W2129702716","doi":"10.1016/j.ast.2004.10.002","title":"Efficient second-order analytical solutions for airfoils in subsonic flows","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aerospace Science and Technology","topic":"Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Inviscid flow; Airfoil; Compressibility; Mechanics; Boundary layer; Mathematics; Reynolds number; Potential flow; Mach number; Wake; Boundary value problem; Mathematical analysis; Physics; Turbulence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002403637,0.00008815667,0.0001114391,0.0003604882,0.0001563701,0.00003053865,0.0001658224,0.0000814952,0.000003439352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008894869,0.00008927438,0.00001582139,0.001622215,0.0003265475,0.00004937449,0.00007337553,0.0001253595,0.000005525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001329351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007113603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006142064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991019,0.000001435387,0.0001214678,0.000228112,0.0001214345,0.000425644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996601,0.00002713005,0.00001018935,0.0001344728,0.0001198626,0.00004824222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000106815,0.00002605605,0.0002092929,0.000009279341,0.000003492247,0.000001923553,0.00004494254,0.6821058,0.007298942,0.3085372,0.00001410469,0.00174784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003500617,0.00003758941,0.001671703,0.00001040929,0.000003000387,0.00001167261,0.00007612418,0.9875948,0.0001465046,0.009860483,0.0001279148,0.0001097137],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677549,0.0002190774,0.0295017,0.001919595,0.0001304334,0.0001563678,0.000007939697,0.000139287,0.000170726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954606,0.00001782384,0.004433411,0.00002773344,0.0000076117,0.00002347789,0.000001757773,0.000007878934,0.00001972527],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.305489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3640504,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006498261969524724,"score_gpt":0.2243409421801804,"score_spread":0.2178426802106557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}