{"id":"W2129790369","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01510.x","title":"SEXUAL, FECUNDITY, AND VIABILITY SELECTION ON FLOWER SIZE AND NUMBER IN A SEXUALLY DIMORPHIC PLANT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Fecundity; Sexual dimorphism; Sexual selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Directional selection; Pollen; Experimental evolution; Botany; Zoology; Genetic variation; Population; Genetics; Demography; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001613143,0.00008017104,0.00009525674,0.000005230721,0.0001293533,0.00001405106,0.00002927234,0.00005666581,0.00008935842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004916195,0.00003298203,0.00000926454,0.0001014424,0.00004510763,0.00008068996,0.00003679021,0.00007657734,0.00001461775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002765518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002410605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001546405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0244006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994493,0.00004461155,0.00008736036,0.000202478,0.00007808243,0.0001382381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998193,0.00009750838,0.00002534254,0.000009562884,0.00001353386,0.00003479168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001105696,0.0001024705,0.9595698,0.000005816717,0.00000462149,0.000002014186,0.0001617224,1.668313e-7,0.03792379,0.0003452652,0.0002289732,0.001544759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008602638,0.0002389012,0.9978338,0.000008090868,0.000003503769,0.00001120712,0.000122219,0.00005922053,0.0001135418,0.001121049,0.0003155263,0.00008687498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986388,0.00004552472,9.253315e-7,0.0001210033,0.00003267047,0.0001027716,0.00002141899,0.00003124811,0.001005642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997377,0.00002168084,0.00002140028,0.00003604731,0.00007202736,0.000007141226,0.000005016037,3.662887e-7,0.0000986228],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03826401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04324087616487756,"score_gpt":0.2091294822748322,"score_spread":0.1658886061099547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}