{"id":"W2129848580","doi":"10.1109/ccece.2008.4564771","title":"An Ant Colony Optimization approach for test pattern generation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering","topic":"VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ant colony optimization algorithms; Benchmark (surveying); Automatic test pattern generation; Computer science; Fault coverage; Test set; Set (abstract data type); Electronic circuit; Algorithm; Combinational logic; Logic gate; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003192286,0.000631538,0.000574847,0.0005731428,0.0002675542,0.0004240337,0.0008119231,0.0006968314,0.001598078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00105181,0.000261351,0.000424082,0.0006139424,0.0003375912,0.0003779269,0.0003907573,0.000711064,0.0002737718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000342316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005498195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001753254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001859543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996624,0.000102646,0.00001632576,0.00004377354,0.0001523485,0.00002253576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996434,0.0001786224,0.00003252487,0.00002747588,0.0001019888,0.00001594136],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006337071,0.00008596918,0.0003891331,0.0001171784,0.00006585535,0.0001342267,0.00004598677,0.7668298,0.01304789,0.01083263,0.001976801,0.2064111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001174298,0.00003601997,0.00004881098,0.000003024273,0.000006709349,0.00003959949,0.000002921096,0.9964755,0.001023908,0.001273574,0.001074673,0.000003461987],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007779121,0.0002316609,0.9880315,0.0001266723,0.00004779976,0.00009063227,0.00002161178,0.0003301797,0.003340843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3115685,0.0004137972,0.6822276,0.0001741934,0.00004242774,0.0004299741,0.000105417,0.00008383709,0.00495432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001753254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005346119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03227123950221634,"score_gpt":0.2016947658982965,"score_spread":0.1694235263960802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}