{"id":"W2129892623","doi":"10.1139/x09-086","title":"Estimating cavity tree and snag abundance using negative binomial regression models and nearest neighbor imputation methods","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Snag; Imputation (statistics); Negative binomial distribution; Statistics; Regression; Regression analysis; Random forest; Mathematics; Missing data; Computer science; Ecology; Biology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01668529,0.0009500888,0.001850585,0.001848641,0.0008696748,0.001341805,0.003485247,0.001070187,0.001930713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0441054,0.0007413575,0.001511531,0.003203043,0.0006284746,0.001929409,0.001520744,0.001918631,0.001142264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006103462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001108909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01890659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02806553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889402,0.00745429,0.0004291571,0.001885539,0.0009379473,0.0003529138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789971,0.01358652,0.002179237,0.00302392,0.001950436,0.0002628022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007390229,0.000549152,0.4250864,0.0003064208,0.001130662,0.000643193,0.0007543009,0.335975,0.001430358,0.0137562,0.009317779,0.2103116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000465899,0.0000798618,0.02891442,0.00004489639,0.000109834,0.0001605062,0.000116278,0.9537774,0.000495585,0.01444243,0.001760385,0.00005181168],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1989367,0.0003753327,0.7956256,0.0002490591,0.00005905727,0.0001479329,0.002011649,0.0007301901,0.001864384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6624086,0.0002455576,0.3298677,0.0001142367,0.00005864714,0.0003795144,0.004782445,0.0001677116,0.001975576],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01890659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08824134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06208340278049906,"score_gpt":0.3828788537365652,"score_spread":0.3207954509560662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}