{"id":"W2129933944","doi":"10.5558/tfc85885-6","title":"TRIAD zoning in Quebec: Experiences and results after 5 years","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Resolute Forest Products (Canada); FPInnovations; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Centre de Géomatique du Québec; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Zoning; Triad (sociology); Forest management; Sustainability; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecosystem management; Sustainable forest management; Forest ecology; Environmental planning; Forestry; Ecosystem; Business; Ecology; Political science; Economics; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002080075,0.0004761343,0.0003734537,0.001056069,0.007175828,0.001913492,0.001613551,0.0009222803,0.00582906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00329002,0.0001695906,0.0003193594,0.002796293,0.001526609,0.0008483576,0.001751028,0.0009926561,0.0004332363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03441672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02503768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929739,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982283,0.000382004,0.00004570012,0.0001400972,0.0004519271,0.0007520121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965445,0.0004508489,0.0002123509,0.0001671127,0.001608422,0.001016747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001723867,0.00876083,0.2537863,0.0008228575,0.0002128043,0.004383271,0.1512526,0.009022419,0.004301345,0.007766671,0.04344842,0.5145186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000392332,0.002261948,0.597085,0.0004425598,0.0001642254,0.0009536126,0.198664,0.00871611,0.002915148,0.001209351,0.1869885,0.0002072049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747592,0.001221684,0.0008304904,0.001312804,0.00003979907,0.0003721803,0.001096481,0.00006283831,0.02030453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709969,0.001038128,0.001954656,0.0003972378,0.00001331041,0.0001618091,0.001290638,0.00003204647,0.02411531],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03441672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2497119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008790197617163266,"score_gpt":0.239866030868302,"score_spread":0.2310758332511387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}