{"id":"W2130008656","doi":"10.29173/cjs6437","title":"Disciplinary Mosaic: The Case of Canadian Sociology","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Sociology; Politics; Government (linguistics); Discipline; Mosaic; Quality (philosophy); Media studies; Social science; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00186779,0.00009030152,0.0002589648,0.0009174406,0.004041893,0.00006675953,0.0007244637,0.0002652697,0.0006984913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003357156,0.00006911314,0.0001827687,0.0003128642,0.007342869,0.0001005164,0.000008510703,0.0006155939,0.00002570206],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001643492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01683619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982081,0.000659269,0.0003515485,0.00009613603,0.00009987425,0.0005850441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981877,0.000271577,0.0002942802,0.0002043968,0.0002292712,0.0008128199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001351097,0.00001047311,0.0008485505,0.000003913269,0.00009445846,0.003094171,0.2917753,0.00004808677,0.00001940845,0.4910945,0.2072628,0.005734739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002206484,0.000201931,0.01061627,0.00001329899,0.00008200448,0.001424466,0.03981878,0.000003420006,0.00000123033,0.1140168,0.8334517,0.0001494851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6996262,0.005007698,0.000004710327,0.2526443,0.001559254,0.0002069706,0.0001057537,0.000005734847,0.04083941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947361,0.0001650404,0.00001857656,0.00301688,0.0006196661,0.000001152594,0.000002085565,0.000006650459,0.001433867],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6261889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03222612719486037,"score_gpt":0.2834605418972986,"score_spread":0.2512344147024382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}