{"id":"W2130011984","doi":"10.1109/qsic.2009.69","title":"Quality of the Source Code for Design and Architecture Recovery Techniques: Utilities are the Problem","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Architecture; Source code; Software architecture; Legacy system; Software engineering; Reverse engineering; Code (set theory); Software maintenance; Quality (philosophy); Software quality; Software system; Software; Reliability engineering; Software development; Engineering; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02895509,0.0009934002,0.001237594,0.003258952,0.001532154,0.004298672,0.003234801,0.002843448,0.002234184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2598183,0.001514639,0.0008513522,0.003032568,0.003250896,0.007065609,0.002390092,0.004000952,0.0022332],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002079691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004707497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003223069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002108162,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9564735,0.01188525,0.003238713,0.003449776,0.02424258,0.0007102092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5684833,0.2002388,0.03729441,0.1248982,0.06716677,0.001918581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009323756,0.0005460584,0.03563427,0.001849057,0.0002027599,0.001151561,0.004692927,0.02266114,0.0344797,0.05509379,0.01817631,0.82458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005560347,0.00117535,0.04641031,0.003564692,0.0005745959,0.006967898,0.002433307,0.3903787,0.2143051,0.1724003,0.1607079,0.0005257544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08769503,0.00242472,0.8810459,0.008980292,0.0003648303,0.0004432765,0.0004904279,0.01327222,0.005283328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.521131,0.001510599,0.4568626,0.002352192,0.0002250825,0.0004507955,0.001482421,0.009001158,0.006984175],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9710449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1531309,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04163803807812538,"score_gpt":0.2929799378455568,"score_spread":0.2513418997674314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}