{"id":"W2130011984","doi":"10.1109/qsic.2009.69","title":"Quality of the Source Code for Design and Architecture Recovery Techniques: Utilities are the Problem","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Architecture; Source code; Software architecture; Legacy system; Software engineering; Reverse engineering; Code (set theory); Software maintenance; Quality (philosophy); Software quality; Software system; Software; Reliability engineering; Software development; Engineering; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001145927,0.00008113507,0.000109479,0.00003522374,0.00009626536,0.0000668939,0.0007811903,0.00004252621,0.000001074144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004896723,0.0000409015,0.00005221906,0.0001833961,0.00007604338,0.00007120733,0.0001348329,0.000136539,2.695366e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001692367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004518317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001346181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006811768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991429,0.000128166,0.000147926,0.0001813811,0.0002201859,0.0001794311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972413,0.002086251,0.00005375484,0.0005203704,0.00007253481,0.00002576631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001348821,0.0001473777,0.004780478,0.0004632247,0.00006628865,9.10218e-7,0.006125965,0.01562674,0.006126222,0.04261687,0.01343859,0.9104725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001122098,0.001645519,0.1160784,0.0005356977,0.00001923803,0.0000752343,0.0009754827,0.03689808,0.1774404,0.6163284,0.04776866,0.001112891],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.005045255,0.0001018562,0.9908093,0.003051597,0.00001836307,0.0006671795,0.000004248194,0.0001959896,0.0001061748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3256281,0.000009088963,0.6726495,0.0004545634,0.00002800361,0.0000764609,2.64675e-7,0.000008223177,0.001145811],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9093596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1667915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04163803807812538,"score_gpt":0.2929799378455568,"score_spread":0.2513418997674314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}