{"id":"W2130021520","doi":"10.1139/s03-010","title":"Comparison of association theory and Freundlich isotherm for describing granular activated carbon adsorption of secondary sewage effluent","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science","topic":"Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freundlich equation; Adsorption; Activated carbon; Effluent; Sewage; Sewage treatment; Wastewater; Chemistry; Thermodynamics; Chemical engineering; Chromatography; Pulp and paper industry; Materials science; Environmental engineering; Environmental science; Organic chemistry; Physics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002794856,0.0006847777,0.0006167279,0.001358162,0.0005256637,0.0006939122,0.00115345,0.001070344,0.0006808317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004664941,0.0001652844,0.0009281023,0.0009710311,0.0004872126,0.00139756,0.000401326,0.0006299582,0.0002789486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001044715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009513852,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003182458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003431989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985276,0.0004132041,0.00008141463,0.00009262812,0.000792463,0.00009271658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979662,0.001067005,0.0001761912,0.0001383661,0.0006150727,0.00003718005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007741941,0.000573908,0.02117377,0.001530465,0.0004479461,0.0005938506,0.0004888232,0.599378,0.1152152,0.0480077,0.002055863,0.2097603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004438775,0.0006586187,0.007159552,0.00003832376,0.0001127716,0.0003763561,0.0001569502,0.9331456,0.03679881,0.01654991,0.004859292,0.00009937971],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3039026,0.00445506,0.6837943,0.0005024785,0.0002403588,0.0002304616,0.0002372131,0.000481937,0.006155691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9188692,0.001824128,0.07631679,0.00008475341,0.00006388293,0.0001793439,0.0002521083,0.00004310243,0.002366819],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003182458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01478082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00807006622294128,"score_gpt":0.2021490712010724,"score_spread":0.1940790049781312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}