{"id":"W2130034323","doi":"10.3394/0380-1330(2008)34[235:lwrala]2.0.co;2","title":"Lake Whitefish Relative Abundance, Length-at-Age, and Condition in Lake Michigan as Indicated by Fishery-independent Surveys","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Michigan Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Coregonus clupeaformis; Abundance (ecology); Catch per unit effort; Relative species abundance; Food web; Fishery; Population density; Population; Geography; Density dependence; Ecology; Biology; Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecosystem; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003943977,0.000142346,0.0001816559,0.0006186418,0.0003946247,0.0003414563,0.0002252273,0.0002708461,0.001271994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001454354,0.0002281136,0.0001692995,0.0005456549,0.000222884,0.0005307344,0.0003835021,0.0001970007,0.0002108215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005406723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003298787,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0437272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1796838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998134,0.00003419706,0.00002025332,0.00004397854,0.00004479722,0.00004342135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991546,0.0001159475,0.0003610681,0.00003160248,0.0001212001,0.0002155672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001339031,0.00001254536,0.9985002,0.000002123484,0.00002005202,0.00002331588,0.00009764168,0.00002580478,0.0003922023,0.000006544636,0.00007788364,0.0007078846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.237136e-7,0.00002040731,0.9997773,5.099066e-7,0.000004967178,0.0000175312,0.00005671774,0.00005429471,0.00003551354,0.000001953071,0.00002916009,7.165746e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996592,0.0000234242,0.00001347623,0.00000865635,6.558024e-7,5.999118e-7,0.0001366421,0.000001569152,0.0001557567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992894,0.00001897024,0.00002600978,0.000006676636,0.000001589444,0.000002158697,0.0002426438,9.120305e-7,0.0004117434],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0437272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08694541,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03045127300538251,"score_gpt":0.2979665019049408,"score_spread":0.2675152288995583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}