{"id":"W2130050759","doi":"10.1139/x05-297","title":"Using bioeconomic models to assess research priorities: a case study on afforestation as a carbon sequestration tool","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Afforestation; Carbon sequestration; Pulpwood; Environmental science; Biomass (ecology); Chronosequence; Opportunity cost; Bioenergy; Agroforestry; Natural resource economics; Biofuel; Forestry; Ecology; Economics; Geography; Soil science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004426501,0.000147386,0.0001800756,0.00148963,0.0005929327,0.0004460612,0.0004517431,0.00008068456,0.000279037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001691811,0.0001437016,0.00005374241,0.0009871437,0.0003035828,0.0005613444,0.00008150961,0.0006165993,0.0002068664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002308634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001200557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6207253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6723906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968311,0.0005264411,0.0004632719,0.0002928975,0.0009960134,0.0008903285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985725,0.0002076681,0.00009527607,0.00033892,0.0001994013,0.0005862044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001797062,0.0002417885,0.6267595,0.00003170951,0.00004387038,0.01560256,0.007409337,0.3221363,0.0005081685,0.01496369,0.01038197,0.001741424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006848474,0.02363745,0.5776871,0.0008074818,0.0001392398,0.006643056,0.04529242,0.1727152,0.0009198413,0.1440486,0.01866296,0.00259809],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743575,0.00001378453,0.0000351031,0.0003313482,0.00010275,0.0009105478,0.000006721747,0.000005511183,0.02423674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978108,0.000002334085,0.0002769539,0.00003349116,0.0002897911,0.00002240135,0.000002381639,0.00002795812,0.001533859],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.149421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6036998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2765066541295432,"score_gpt":0.4263307809191327,"score_spread":0.1498241267895895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}