{"id":"W2130225078","doi":"","title":"Food for Thought: An Analysis of Pro-Environmental Behaviours and Food Choices in Ontario Environmental Studies Programs.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of environmental education","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental education; Subject matter; Humanities; Theme (computing); Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Art","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004395982,0.0003411842,0.0005283448,0.0004450418,0.0002031239,0.0000607644,0.0003438679,0.0001434478,0.002880637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003070984,0.0003402948,0.0002170192,0.0002118127,0.0009642394,0.001105456,0.00007040812,0.0002813797,0.00001063138],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004163459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002754357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02946468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3490978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976029,0.0001273836,0.0008746657,0.000504848,0.0003885152,0.0005017275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982752,0.00005545221,0.0005423388,0.0003671952,0.000005793086,0.0007540339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001847646,0.001135875,0.9698592,0.00001227239,0.0002082884,8.635571e-7,0.007412606,0.000224645,0.001086424,0.00001885789,0.00005034509,0.01997208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000523115,0.001486905,0.962277,0.00002122941,0.0003999607,0.00001816336,0.03269598,0.00006805726,0.0002726228,0.0003654106,0.001556353,0.0003151993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970549,0.001067276,0.00001145497,0.0001863521,0.0002367087,0.001244882,0.0001015508,0.000003767924,0.00009305125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997497,0.00008400646,0.001410021,0.0001642482,0.00003722923,0.0001755169,0.0001842593,0.00003304652,0.0004147119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3196331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999049,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01727202127784451,"score_gpt":0.2532275896321738,"score_spread":0.2359555683543293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}